|
The
following was prepared from the classical genealogical and heraldic reference
"Herbarz Polski" by Kasper Niesiecki, S. J., Lipsk (Leipzig)
edition, 1839-1846. For each herb [clan shield, coat of arms] the blazon or
verbal description of the arms is first given in authentic heraldic style,
followed by a translation from the Polish description by Niesiecki. The right
and left sides of a shield are identified from the standpoint of the bearer, i.
e., the one holding the shield. His right would be your left and vice versa. The
tinctures (colors) in heraldry are as follows: azure = blue, gules = red; sable
= black; or = gold, argent = silver; vert = green. In heraldry all charges
(pictures) on a shield are assumed to be facing dexter (right side) unless
otherwise specified. In Polish heraldry all animals or birds are assumed to be
in their natural coloring unless otherwise specified.
The blazon, or verbal description, of the
Dabrowa clan shield for the surname of Kostka is given below in
the authentic heraldic style, then, followed by a translation
from the Polish description:
"Arms: azure, between two
crosses pateé fitchee or, a horseshoe argent, the heels in base,
surmounted of another cross pateé of the second; issuant of a
helmet befitting his degree, mantled of his liveries, whereon is
set for a crest: upon a ducal coronet a vol sable pierced by an
arrow fessways, argent, flighted or, the point to sinister."
On a field of blue
between two ancient crosses pointed at the bottom stands a silver
horseshoe, with still another golden cross at its top. On a
helmet and crown is a vulture wing black in color, pierced by a
silver arrow with golden feathers in an angular position pointing
to the left. (In heraldry, the right and left sides of a
shield are identified from the standpoint of the bearer, i. e.,
the one who is holding the shield. His right would be your left
and vice versa).
The tinctures/metals (colors) in heraldry are as follows: or
= gold; argent = silver; azure = blue; sable
= black.
Mantle liveries: are the colorful swirls eminating from behind
the shield and helmet, as in this case azure and argent (blue and
silver).
The Polish blazon is as follows: "w polu blekitnem
podkowa biala polerowana, krzyz na niej zlocisty, a drugie takiez
dwa po koncach, barkiem do góry podniesiona stoi, koncami
nadól, na helmie skrzydlo sepie, a przez nie strzala, z dolu ku
górze przelatujaca. "
Niesiecki cites the following sources: Bielski fol. 173, Paprocki
in Gniazdo cnoty, fol. 1104 and 1159, 0 herbach
fol. 329 and fol. 662, Okolski Orbis Polonus, vol. 1
fol. 128, Klejnoty fol. 45,
History of the Dabrowa clan arms and
ancestry
I will cite here what Rev. Duryewski says on the origin of these
arms in Niezeszla Pamiatka Kostków, page 3. The
ancestor of this family, according to Paprocki, was a native-born
Pole of that family whose coat of arms was a horseshoe and on it
an elevated cross, which we call Poboze (as Kromer gives
it, vol. 1) or (as in the Statutes of Laski, page 127) Pobodze,
now more commonly known as Pobóg. The author of the
first history of Prussian Poland asserts in his manuscripts that
the first ancestor of the Dabrowa clan was a foreign knight who,
when the Christian armies made an expedition in 1096 to recover
Jerusalem and with it the grave of Christ, had accompanied
Godfrey of Boullion to the holy war and dispatched before him a
legation to King Boleslaw Krzywousty of Poland to ask for free
passage through his kingdom to Carogród. When this ancestor
distinguished himself by his courage at Jerusalem, Godfrey, who
had been elevated to the Kingship of Jerusalem, bestowed on him a
new coat of arms, a rendition of Calvary that is, the hill of Our
Lord's death with three crosses, which we call Dabrowa.
Returning from Palestine through our country of Poland, he
settled here and propagated his family. (Histor. Polon.
Pruth. Posselii in Coll. Premisl. S. I, fol. 56.)
Konopatski's manuscripts give something similar to this, with the
addition that two brothers from Lotharingia mounted an expedition
to Palestine with several hundred men in 1104 and describes these
adornments earned there by bravery. This story, however, appears
to be more fiction than fact. Firstly, it does not cite any more
ancient authors; furthermore, it does not agree with established
history in several matters, among them: it makes Krzywousty the
monarch of Poland in 1096, whereas he did not ascend to the
throne of Poland till 1102; and the arms themselves of this house
show that its author was a member of the Pobógs who added to his
ancestral arms only two lateral crosses. There is also little
resemblance between a horsehoe and Calvary; and the name of these
arms, Dabrowa, clearly demands that it originated in a Slavic
language, not a foreign one; and supposedly this Pobóg took
these arms out of piety, to the credit of his relatives, and the
occasion of their origin was as follows. A large force of enemies
attacked Polish territory and ravaged it with customary cruelty;
to repel the sudden attack, the Polish nobles and knights of
several counties assembled swiftly, but they could not match
their foes in force and numbers; their leader, wishing to conceal
the meagerness of his forces, arrayed them at Dabrowa or an oak
grove [in Polish, a dabrowa] and awaited a suitable
occasion for battle. The foe called this delay cowardice and
scoffed at them. One of the brave men, a member of the Pobóg
clan, could not bear this disgrace, and urging his horse forward
he attacked the foe so mightily that he broke their ranks and
tore through their detachments, killing many of them on the spot;
the others, seeing this, dashed to his aid and, behind this one
whose heart and fortune had made it possible, they routed the
enemy. Then in memory of this deed of valor, and supposedly for
having fought his way through two detachments of these enemies of
the Holy Cross, he added two lateral crosses to his ancestral
coat of arms. As for the helm, however, I understand that it was
acquired by augmentation on another occasion; I do not know, but
it might have come from an extraordinary archer's having shot
down a vulture flying over the army. This was taken as a good
sign, for otherwise the ancients did not take vultures flying
over the army as a good omen, believing that this bird which
feeds on corpses could foresee defeat and would head for wherever
more corpses would fall, as Horus Apollo writes - but
about this wing the historians say nothing. What is certain from
them is that the name and the coat of arms Dabrowa came
from the Dabrowa by which our army stood; some also call
it Dabowa, but this is supposedly a printer's error from
omission of the letter r.
Some eulogizers were of the understanding that this first
ancestor of the Dabrowa clan about whom we have been speaking was
the renowned Mazovian wojewoda Przybyslaw z Rostkowa. For me this
tidings are groundless, about which more later. The more ancient
authors who mention this give neither the names of this knight
and of the enemies defeated by his example, nor the year in which
this happened, nor the place at which this victory was
accomplished. I would take it as having happened in Mazovia, or
on the border of that province, inasmuch as his descendants had
their seat in Mazovia province since ancient times. I conclude
also that the foe was from those regions adjacent to the Duchy of
Mazovia to the north or to the east, that is, either the Jadzwings, the
Podlasians, the Lithuanians, or the old Prussians,
all at that time enemies of the Poles. As for what I read in the
manuscripts of Rev. Rutka, that they were Teutonic Knights, the
cavalry order of the German nation settled in Prussia, that does
not work. For the family of the Dabrowa clan unquestionably
appeared in Mazovia well before the Teutonic Knights in Prussia,
for the latter, according to Treter in 1225, Dusbruchiusz in
1226, and Dlugosz in 1230, were summoned to those regions by the
Mazovian prince Conrad; while the Dabrowa clan, already well
propagated, were holding the first offices of the Mazovian senate
in a creditable manner, as for instance Boguta z Rostkowa,-
Mazovian wojewoda in 1232. Przybyslaw z Rostkowa
occupied the same seat in 1246. Furthermore, it is clear from the
annals of Poland that at this time the Teutonic Knights, having
taken benefices within recent memory, had no quarrel with the
Poles, their founders and benefactors; they had already quarreled
with the Pomeranians, but not yet being great in numbers, they
fought, mostly with Polish reinforcements, against the pagan
Prussians, and only began to fight with us after 1300. I also
regard as certain that this family of the Dabrowas had their
origins not in the days of King Wladyslaw Lokietek, but
supposedly before his grandfather, the Mazovian prince Conrad. It
is difficult to establish the time, however, although it can be
confirmed that it was perhaps around 1100, as before 1041 the
Pobozans were noted for their good counsel and dignity (Bielski
fol. 70), of whom one sent a legation for Kazimierz I. Some
have stated in print that one of the Dabrowa clan, the third from
the first author of this family, accepted holy Baptism in 965
with Mieczyslaw, the first Christian among the Polish princes,
but I take that to refer to a Jastrzebczyk. I noted Marcin of
arms Dabrowa, Mazovian wojewoda in 1937, among the
senators of that province.
Bearers of these arms:
| Budzynski |
Kostka |
| Chociwski |
Laskowski |
| Ciechanowiecki |
Lauxmin |
| Dabrowski |
Los |
| Garlinski |
Mlodzianowski |
| Glodowski |
Morawski |
| Jablonski |
Napierski |
|
Jakimowicz |
Plodownicki |
| Januszewski |
Porzecki |
| Jarzebinski |
Rostkowski |
| Karas |
Secyminski |
| Karniewski |
Sierzputowski |
| Kiszka |
Zgierski |
| Koc |
|
Kuropatnicki and others also ascribe these arms to these
families: Boguta, Lepkowski, Podolec, Smolechowski, Wdzienk, Dabrowa,
Mikoszewski, Siemienski, Talko, Zelkowski.
|